Search Results for 'script'

[Steven Jones]

I have script field that outputs markdown. The markdown works correctly.

In another form I have a field that is defined as a Link To Form field. The Link to Form field contains the script field from the other form. The Markdown is not rendered properly. It displays the markdown.

[Steven Jones]

Checkmark Field checked on Universal layout can’t be found in a saved search.

I have a checkmark field on the default layout and a universal layout. I have a saved search that finds all of the records with the checkmark set to true.

If I set the checkmark on the default layout the saved search works correctly. If I set the checkmark on the universal layout it is not registered as true by the saved search. The checkmark shows up on the default layout but the saved search doesn’t register the check. If you uncheck the checkmark and recheck it on the default layout then it works.

I wrote a script to count the records with the checkmark checked and it didn’t see the records that were checked on the universal layout.

I tried a screen layout and it didn’t have this problem.

[Steve-Kai Vyska]

Hi Brend.

I was thinking about that, but the problem there ist, that you can only joint 1:many. that does not solve my problem, because I need to be able to split billings an there it get complicated, because I can only set one common field criteria. That ist the fun with many to many so that you can select which belongs to wich without self coded criteria. As I said doing it per hand works fine but I wanted to do it via script and that does not seem to word, when noch creating new record :(

Have a nice day

Steve

[Brendan]

A Join relationship is the same as a Many to Many except it is managed by a common field in the parent and child forms. Perhaps your script could just populate the common field? Then Tap Forms establishes the relationship for you based on matching values in the matched fields in both forms.

[Brendan]

Hi Eric,

It takes a lot of time to keep Tap Forms up-to-date with all the changes that Apple makes to the operating systems year after year. Plus to fix bugs, add new features, and so on. To expect a one-time payment to get the benefits of all of that forever is no longer financially viable for me. Yes, there’s the upgrade model, but as you know, Apple doesn’t support that model in the App Store. I did that once before with Tap Forms 5 by releasing it as a new application with a migration function. Tap Forms Pro is the last time that I have to do that as now I’ll be able to release fixes, new features, and updates to account for OS changes as I go. I won’t have to hold back updates or new features for some big feature upgrade once a year or two. Everyone will now get them as I finish them. Plus I’ve been providing support to all my customers, no matter which version they bought for 18 years now. That also takes time away from development. I love providing help to all my customers. Everyone has always been super nice and I’ve been very grateful for that.

The Rosetta issue is unfortunate. I had fully expected Apple to just keep it there forever. I put a note in the App Store for Tap Forms 5 that it does require Rosetta. It will continue to function forever on Intel Macs of course and anyone who stays at macOS 27 on Apple Silicon Macs. I know that’s not feasible for everyone though. But it is what it is and the decision to remove Rosetta was out of my hands. Tap Forms 5 relies on a database engine that is no longer supported and was compiled for Intel on Mac. In Tap Forms Pro I yanked that out and replaced it with Apple’s CoreData engine and raw SQLite. So that will never be an issue again. Just doing that took me about a year of development.

So I’m very sorry that you’re disappointed in my decision to move to a subscription model, but without having done that, I saw the end of the road for Tap Forms. Revenues were declining year after year and now I’ve finally managed to turn that around. Now Tap Forms Pro has a very bright future ahead of it.

Tap Forms Pro has been out for just over a year now and I’m now starting to see a rise in my income from last year rather than just barely scraping by with a declining income year after year.

I hope you better understand my decision now.

Brendan

[Steve-Kai Vyska]

Hello everyone,

I have a form called **Rental Claims** which contains a subform called **Bookings**. The Bookings subform is populated by a script that imports transactions from a bank statement file. This part is working well.

When I work manually, I can use the selection dialog in the Bookings subform to view existing booking records and assign them accordingly.

My question is: **How can I perform this assignment via script?**

I cannot simply create the bookings directly in the script because I may need to assign multiple bookings to a single rental claim, or split a single booking across multiple rental claims. Therefore, a **many-to-many relationship** would be ideal, but I have not been able to create these assignments through scripting.

Has anyone done something similar or can point me in the right direction?

Thanks in advance for any information or suggestions.

Steve

[eric]

Good morning, Brendan.

One of the reasons I chose to use your application—and support a small independent developer rather than a large tech company—was that, years ago, you mentioned that you were not a fan of subscription-based software. I appreciated that philosophy and it was one of the factors that led me to purchase Tap Forms.
So, to my disappointment, I now see that Tap Forms 5 appears to be reaching end-of-life and that the future direction is moving toward a subscription model. Needless to say, I am not particularly happy about this change.

What concerns me even more is that Tap Forms 5 currently relies on Rosetta. As Apple continues to phase out support for Rosetta, there will likely come a point where Tap Forms 5 will no longer run on future versions of macOS. This effectively leaves existing customers with little choice but to move to the new subscription-based version if they want to continue using the software.

Could you clarify the situation? Will Tap Forms 5 continue to be available and supported as a one-time purchase application, while the new version is offered separately as a subscription? Or is the subscription model intended to completely replace Tap Forms 5 once Rosetta is no longer available?

If the latter is the plan, then I will unfortunately need to start looking for alternative software. I understand that subscriptions provide ongoing revenue for development, but personally I am not willing to pay an annual subscription for a personal database application. At roughly $45–50 USD per year, the cost is difficult for me to justify, especially when I originally purchased the software with the expectation of a traditional one-time purchase model.

Thank you for any clarification you can provide.

[Kevin Winspear]

I’ve been experimenting with Tap Forms Pro’s scripting capabilities and wanted to share a workflow I’ve been using successfully.

One of my goals was to avoid having my data locked into any single application. I use Tap Forms as my structured database, but I also use Obsidian for note-taking and knowledge management.

Using a Tap Forms script, I’ve set things up so that whenever I add or update a record, a Markdown (.md) file is automatically generated and written directly into my Obsidian vault.

For example, in my Movies database, the script creates a note containing:

* YAML frontmatter
* Movie metadata (title, year, rating, tags, etc.)
* Cover image references
* IMDb links
* Description and cast information

The generated note is immediately available in Obsidian without any manual export step.

A simplified workflow looks like this:

Tap Forms Record
→ Metadata Updated
→ Script Runs
→ Markdown File Generated
→ Obsidian Vault Updated

One advantage is that my information remains portable. The data exists in Tap Forms, but I also have a complete set of Markdown files that can be used in Obsidian or any other Markdown-based application.

I’ve now started using the same approach with several of my Tap Forms databases, not just movies.

I’m posting this partly because I think Tap Forms’ scripting features are incredibly powerful, and partly because there may be other users interested in integrating Tap Forms with Obsidian or other Markdown-based workflows.

If there’s interest, I’d be happy to share more details about the script and how I set everything up.

[Daniel Leu]

This shouldn’t be difficult to do with a script. Would you be willing to share your Tap Forms template with me? (You can find it under File > Export > Form Template (TFF). If you’d rather, feel free to email it to me. Once I have the template, I’ll give it a shot.)

Cheers, Daniel

---
See https://lab.danielleu.com/tapformspro/ for scripts and tips&tricks

[Steve-Kai Vyska]

Sorry for the late Answer was messing around with the scripts. Yes it is working 👍

[Brendan]

Your best bet for now would be to export your records to an Excel spreadsheet and then import it into Excel (or Numbers) and do some summarization there. At the moment I don’t have a function that would do that. Tap Forms will compute totals for each category, but it will also display the details.

But of course you could write a script for it to just dump out the summary data in the console. But it would be easier for you to use Excel. Especially if you’re not familiar with scripting.

Thanks,

Brendan

[pierrot_rennes]

Hello,

I have a database with 5185 records in 58 categories.
It’s a collection of comic book puzzles, and the different categories correspond to the comic book titles, as shown in the screenshot.
In the database, there are two scripts that highlight puzzles in the collection and those that are incomplete (scripts created by a form user at least 6 years ago).
I would like to automatically retrieve the number of puzzles in the collection and the number of missing puzzles for each category into a table.
I don’t know if this is possible with a script, and I don’t know how to do it either, as I’m not familiar with scripting.
Thank you for your information, and perhaps it’s not feasible. The screenshots show my database, the relevant fields, and a table as it could be created.

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[Glen Forister]

I got the script to work, thanks. BUT, not all dayofyear values are the same for multiple records of the same day. What does that, to be off a day?
Thanks for sticking with me on this.

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[Glen Forister]

OMG, how did I miss using the script window instead of the calc. I’m sorry. Just haven’t had to edit a script in a while I guess.

I changed the field type to SCRIPT.
I bring up the SCRIPT window and it has an example starting script. I can delete it, but I can’t past into the winddow the script you supplied.
If I try to type it, I’ll have many mistakes to weed out and that will be a big waste of both of our time.
How can I paste something into that SCRIPT window. I remember not being able to add the fld- number by copy and paste, but I never complained about that until now.

[Daniel Leu]

You can use field.sortedTableFields to get field details of a table.

Following function copies the values from the source record to a new row in the table of the current record. I’ve verified for text and number fields.

/**
 * copyRecordToTable(srcRecord, tableId)
 *
 * Copies values from srcRecord into a new row appended to the table field
 * identified by tableId, for all fields whose names match between the
 * source record's form and the table.
 *
 * @param {TFRecord} srcRecord  - The source record to copy values from.
 * @param {string}   tableId    - The field ID of a Table-type field on the record.
 * @returns {TFRecord}          - The newly created table row record.
 */
function copyRecordToTable(srcRecord, tableId) {
    // Resolve the table field from the record's own form using the field ID.
    const table = form.getFieldWithId(tableId);

    // Get the fields defined on the table, keyed by name for fast lookup.
    const tableFields = table.sortedTableFields;
    const tableFieldsByName = {};
    for (var i = 0; i < tableFields.length; i++) {
        var tf = tableFields;
        tableFieldsByName[tf.name] = tf;
    }

    // Add a new row to the table.
    const newRow = record.addNewRecordToField(tableId);

    // Walk every field on the source record's form and copy matching values.
    const sourceFields = srcRecord.form.fetchFields();
    for (var j = 0; j < sourceFields.length; j++) {
        var sf = sourceFields[j];
        var match = tableFieldsByName[sf.name];
        if (match) {
            var value = srcRecord.getFieldValue(sf.getId());
            newRow.setFieldValue(match.getId(), value);
        }
    }

    return newRow;
}

To verfiy, I use this sample script which just adds a random record to the table.

function selectSourceRecord(formName) {
	// return a random record from the form formName

	const records = document.getFormNamed(formName).fetchRecords();
	const index = Math.floor(Math.random() * records.length);
	return records[index];
}

function Copy_Record_To_Product_Table() {

	// source form name	
	const sourceFormName = "Products";

	// select a random record from the source form
	const sourceRecord = selectSourceRecord(sourceFormName);

	// table field name
	const tableFieldName = "Products";

	// get the table field
    const tableId = form.getFieldNamed(tableFieldName).getId();

	// copy the record to the table
	copyRecordToTable(sourceRecord, tableId);

    document.saveAllChangesAndRefresh();
}

Copy_Record_To_Product_Table();

Let me know if this works for you!

• This reply was modified 3 weeks, 2 days ago by Daniel Leu.
• This reply was modified 3 weeks, 2 days ago by Daniel Leu.
• This reply was modified 3 weeks, 2 days ago by Daniel Leu.

Cheers, Daniel

---
See https://lab.danielleu.com/tapformspro/ for scripts and tips&tricks